 |
 |
to fill out a simple form to connect to DUI Lawyers in your area.
|
|
|
|
|
Chase v. Neth5/27/2005
review provisions of § 60-498.01 provided Chase with meaningful notice and an opportunity to be heard, and thus fully comport with due process. See Mathews v. Eldridge, supra.
CONCLUSION
For the reasons set forth above, we conclude the district court erred in determining that the absence of a statutory procedure to challenge a motorist's arrest in an ALR case based upon post-arrest refusal to submit constitutes a denial of due process and that the applicable ALR statutes satisfied Chase's right to due process. The judgment of the district court is therefore reversed, and the cause remanded for further proceedings.
Reversed and remanded for further proceedings.
|