 |
 |
to fill out a simple form to connect to DUI Lawyers in your area.
|
|
|
|
|
State v. Boheler5/13/2005
Submitted May 1, 2005
APPEAL DISMISSED
Lester James Boheler appeals his guilty pleas for driving under the influence , fourth offense; driving under suspension, third offense; and being a habitual traffic offender. Boheler's appellate counsel has petitioned to be relieved as counsel, stating he has reviewed the record and concluded Boheler's appeal is without merit. The sole issue briefed by counsel contends Boheler's guilty pleas were rendered invalid by the circuit court's statement that Boheler had ten days in which to file a notice of intent to appeal. Boheler did not file a separate pro se brief.
After a review of the record and briefs as required by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967) and State v. Williams, 305 S.C. 116, 406 S.E.2d 357 (1991), we hold there are no directly appealable issues arguable on their merits. Accordingly, we dismiss this appeal and grant counsel's petition to be relieved.
APPEAL DISMISSED.
GOOLSBY, HUFF, and KITTREDGE, JJ., concur.
Page 1 South Carolina DUI Attorneys
DUI Lawyers
|
| |
to fill out a simple form to connect to DUI Lawyers in your area.
|
|