 |
 |
to fill out a simple form to connect to DUI Lawyers in your area.
|
|
|
|
|
State v. Stovall5/24/2005
er indicated that the basis for revocation was "new criminal conduct; to wit: introducing contraband into jail." Further, after hearing the proof at the revocation hearing, the trial court opined, "I think she intended to take those two pills into the jail with her. I think she knew exactly what she was doing there. I revoke her probation to serve her sentence." Upon review of both the transcript and the order, we conclude that the requirement of a written statement is met. The trial court explicitly stated the grounds for revocation in the order, the reasoning was explained at the conclusion of the hearing, and the record contained the testimony the trial court relied upon in reaching its decision. Therefore, the defendant's due process rights were not violated.
Conclusion
We affirm the revocation of the defendant's probation.
Page 1 2 3 4 Tennessee DUI Attorneys
DUI Lawyers
|
| |
to fill out a simple form to connect to DUI Lawyers in your area.
|
|