 |
 |
to fill out a simple form to connect to DUI Lawyers in your area.
|
|
|
|
|
People v. Patrick1/4/2005
e definition of the crime set forth elsewhere in these instructions.' Here, the separate instruction defining the crime included the requirement that the defendant act `knowingly.' There was no need to restate this in CALJIC No. 3.31.5." (People v. Laster (1997) 52 Cal.App.4th 1450, 1469.)
DISPOSITION
The judgment is affirmed.
Page 1 2 3 California DUI Attorneys
DUI Lawyers
|
| |
to fill out a simple form to connect to DUI Lawyers in your area.
|
|