 |
 |
to fill out a simple form to connect to DUI Lawyers in your area.
|
|
|
|
|
State v. Jennings1/19/2005
Submitted January 1, 2005
APPEAL DISMISSED
David Wayne Jennings appeals from his guilty pleas to driving under suspension and driving under the influence . Jennings argues his pleas were not freely and voluntarily given pursuant to Boykin v. Alabama, 395 U.S. 238 (1965), because the trial judge did not adequately advise him of the sentencing consequences of the charges. Jennings' counsel attached to the brief a petition to be relieved as counsel, stating that she had reviewed the record and concluded this appeal lacks merit. After a thorough review of the record and counsel's brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967) and State v. Williams, 305 S.C. 116, 406 S.E.2d 357 (1991), we dismiss Jennings's appeal and grant counsel's motion to be relieved.
APPEAL DISMISSED.
HEARN, C.J., GOOLSBY and WILLIAMS, JJ., concur.
Page 1 South Carolina DUI Attorneys
DUI Lawyers
|
| |
to fill out a simple form to connect to DUI Lawyers in your area.
|
|