 |
 |
to fill out a simple form to connect to DUI Lawyers in your area.
|
|
|
|
|
State v. Arbuckle12/5/2001
about where he was and where he was going. After conducting field sobriety tests, Deputy Birdwell determined that the Defendant was intoxicated and asked him to submit to a blood alcohol content test. The Defendant consented and the test revealed a blood alcohol content of .14%. Deputy Pickard also testified that, based upon his observation of the Defendant, he believed the Defendant to be intoxicated.
Based on the above facts, we find sufficient evidence to support the jury finding the Defendant guilty beyond a reasonable doubt of driving under the influence , driving under the influence, per se, and driving under the influence, second offense. The judgment of the trial court is affirmed.
CONCLUSION
Accordingly, for the foregoing reasons, we AFFIRM the judgment of the trial court.
|