 |
 |
to fill out a simple form to connect to DUI Lawyers in your area.
|
|
|
|
|
State v. Eady12/4/2001
orrections to serve.
Although the Defendant contends that the trial court failed to consider appropriate mitigating factors, it is clear from the record that the trial court conducted a thorough analysis of each mitigating factor proposed by the Defendant. However, the court ultimately rejected each of the proposed mitigating factors. Having reviewed the record, we agree with the trial court's findings concerning each mitigating factor proposed by the defense. As previously stated, the weight to be given each factor is within the discretion of the trial judge. Shelton, 854 S.W.2d at 123. The trial court applied two enhancement factors, which it granted substantial weight, and found no mitigating factors. We conclude that the Defendant's sentence is adequately supported by the record and that it complies with the purposes and principles of the 1989 Sentencing Reform Act. See Moss, 727 S.W.2d at 237. We therefore decline to modify the Defendant's sentence.
Accordingly, we AFFIRM the judgment of the trial court.
Page 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 Tennessee DUI Attorneys
DUI Lawyers
|
| |
to fill out a simple form to connect to DUI Lawyers in your area.
|
|