 |
 |
to fill out a simple form to connect to DUI Lawyers in your area.
|
|
|
|
|
Commonwealth v. Blake9/17/2001
idence of receipt by the addressee." Commonwealth v. Koney, 421 Mass. 295, 303-304 (1995). Commonwealth v. Lora, 43 Mass. App. Ct. 136, 143 (1997).
Lastly, the defendant asserts that since the notices used the abbreviation "DWI" as opposed to "OUI," there is no evidence that he had been convicted under G. L. c. 90, á24(a)(1). This argument is also meritless, as the notices also referred to "Liquor." The jury could have reasonably inferred that a conviction for "DWI Liquor" constituted a conviction for operating a motor vehicle while under the influence of alcohol and that it was the present defendant who was previously convicted thereunder. See Commonwealth v. Anderson, 48 Mass. App. Ct. 508, 511 (2000), citing Commonwealth v. Roman, 427 Mass. 1006, 1007 (1998) (jury may draw reasonable and possible inferences from circumstantial evidence).
Judgment affirmed.
Page 1 2 3 Massachusetts DUI Attorneys
DUI Lawyers
|
| |
to fill out a simple form to connect to DUI Lawyers in your area.
|
|