 |
 |
to fill out a simple form to connect to DUI Lawyers in your area.
|
|
|
|
|
State v. Lamont7/11/2001
t analysis. The "reasonableness" of the intrusion is examined only after the requisite legal justification for the initial intrusion itself is satisfied. United States v. United States Dist. Court for Eastern Dist. of Mich., 407 US 297, 315-18, 92 SCt 2125, 2136-37 (1972) ("Though the Fourth Amendment speaks broadly of 'unreasonable searches and seizures,' the definition of 'reasonableness' turns, at least in part, on the more specific commands of the warrant clause"). The prosecution through one blood test could prove the element of "legal drunkenness." A second test is not necessary.
[ .] Therefore, I respectfully dissent.
Page 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 South Dakota DUI Attorneys
DUI Lawyers
|
| |
to fill out a simple form to connect to DUI Lawyers in your area.
|
|