DUI Lawyers Directory. Search for a dui lawyer near you. Operating a vehicle while drinking could cause judicial actions.
 Zip Code Search for DUI Lawyers
Defending Alleged Drunk Driving Criminal Acts Read about successful dui defense cases from member dui lawyers Read about successful dui defense cases from member dui lawyers Membership at DUI Defenders Discuss issues related to dui/dwi/owi Contact Us about a DUI Lawyer
facebook.com/MyDUI

  to fill out a simple form to connect to DUI Lawyers in your area.

Barber v. State

6/23/2000

Appeal from the Circuit Court for Polk County; Ronald A. Herring, Judge.


Gwendolyn Barber challenges her judgment and sentence for driving under the influence with serious bodily injury. Barber's counsel filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). We find no merit to the issues raised by Barber. However, our independent review of the record reveals that Barber may be entitled to resentencing.


The Supreme Court of Florida has recently ruled that chapter 95-184, Laws of Florida, which enacted the 1995 sentencing guidelines, violates the single subject rule. See Heggs v. State, 25 Fla. L. Weekly S137 (Fla. Feb. 17, 2000), revised by 25 Fla. L. Weekly S359 (Fla. May 4, 2000). The record reveals that Barber was sentenced under the 1995 sentencing guidelines. Since her offense was committed on July 27, 1996, Barber has standing to assert entitlement to resentencing. See Smith v. State, 25 Fla. L. Weekly D1273 (Fla. 2d DCA May 24, 2000) (holding that the window period for standing to challenge chapter 95-184 on single subject rule grounds in most cases opened on October 1, 1995, and closed on May 24, 1997).


In this case, the trial court stated at the sentencing hearing that its "intention was to give [Barber] the bottom of the guidelines, whatever that happened to be . . . ." We recognize that Heggs does not require resentencing unless a defendant's sentence under the 1995 guidelines constitutes a departure sentence under the 1994 guidelines. See Smith, 25 Fla. L. Weekly D1273. This is a case in which that result may seem harsh because it is unlikely that Barber will have a right to resentencing on remand. However, even if Heggs would not require resentencing, the trial court, in its discretion, may reduce or modify Barber's sentence pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(c). We remand this case to the trial court to reconsider this sentence. See Smith, 25 Fla. L. Weekly D1273.


Remanded for reconsideration.


BLUE, A.C.J., and ALTENBERND, J., Concur.






Page 1 

Florida DUI Attorneys    DUI Lawyers


  to fill out a simple form to connect to DUI Lawyers in your area.

DUI Driving Defined Highway Defined
Under Influence Defined DUI/3 Strikes DUI & Manslaughter
DUI & Murder DUI Punishment Sobriety Checkpoints
DMV's Role in DUI Revocation vs. Suspension Field Sobriety Testing
Speed Measurement Prior DUI Convictions Drawing Blood & Consent
Refusal to Test DUI Lawyers Testimonials by Member DUI Lawyers
DUI Articles Ignition Interlock Implied Consent
Summary DUI License Suspension In-home Arrest Vehicle Defined
FDP  |   RSS Feeds  |  Articles  |  Jobs  |  Leads  |  Partner Websites  |  Draeger FAQ
SiteMap | DUI Blog | DUI Lawyers | DUI Attorneys | Trading Partners | Member Agreement | Terms of Service
Attorneys Click Here | DUI Case Laws | FAQ | DUI Forum | Directory of DUI Attorneys | Success Stories  | Press Releases
Copyright © 2004. “DUI Defenders”. All rights reserved.