 |
 |
to fill out a simple form to connect to DUI Lawyers in your area.
|
|
|
|
|
State v. Taylor4/11/2000
nstitutes another reason he should be allowed to withdraw his pleas. He does not present any legal analysis establishing error by the court, however, and it is well established that an appellant bears the burden of establishing error. See, e.g., Estate of Lande, 1999 MT 162, 30, 295 Mont. 160, 30, 983 P.2d 308, 30 (citation omitted). Moreover, an appellant must cite to authorities supporting the issues and arguments raised (Rule 23(a)(4), M.R.App.P.), and Taylor has failed to do so. Therefore, we need not address this issue further.
We affirm the District Court and vacate the special conditions relating to registration and DNA testing.
We concur:
J. A. TURNAGE
JIM REGNIER
WILLIAM E. HUNT, SR.
JAMES C. NELSON
|