 |
 |
to fill out a simple form to connect to DUI Lawyers in your area.
|
|
|
|
|
Jennings v. Director of Revenue4/6/1999
he Supreme Court has ruled that the procedures in Chapter 302 are adequate to meet constitutional requirements of due process and equal protection. Riche, slip op.; Stewart v. Director of Revenue, 702 S.W.2d 472, 475 (Mo. banc 1986).
Jennings' violation occurred inside Cameron city limits. Bashor, a certified law enforcement officer, endeavored to stop Jennings' pickup for an investigatory stop inside the city limits. Jennings did not stop immediately; he drove his pickup more than half a mile before stopping outside the city limits. Bashor had probable cause to arrest Jennings for driving while intoxicated. Jennings agreed to submit to a breath test which indicated that his blood alcohol concentration was .148 percent. From these facts, we do not discern any barrier to the director's suspending Jennings' driving license.
The circuit court, therefore, erred in overturning the director's decision. We reverse the circuit court's judgment and order the reinstatement of the director's suspension.
Separate Opinion:
None
Page 1 2 3 Missouri DUI Attorneys
DUI Lawyers
|
| |
to fill out a simple form to connect to DUI Lawyers in your area.
|
|