 |
 |
to fill out a simple form to connect to DUI Lawyers in your area.
|
|
|
|
|
State v. Dueker4/13/1999
tute a criminal offense in that the applicable statutes do not provide criminal penalties for violation of section 303.025.
The record reveals that defendant failed to raise this issue before, during, or after trial. No reference to this issue appears in his motion for new trial. Although we may review for plain error under Rule 30.20 if manifest inJustice or miscarriage of Justice has resulted from a ruling affecting substantial rights, we decline to do so here because we do not find defendant's argument to have merit. See sections 303.025 and 303.370.5; cf. State v. Mayo, 915 S.W.2d 758, 762-63 (Mo.banc 1996) (holding that the suspension or revocation of a driver's license is not a sanction which, once imposed, precludes the application of criminal sanctions). Point denied.
Judgment affirmed.
|