 |
 |
to fill out a simple form to connect to DUI Lawyers in your area.
|
|
|
|
|
Gaffney v. State3/25/1998
Likewise, we conclude the evidence is factually sufficient to support appellant's convictions. We have examined the entire record under the factual sufficiency standard of review. After doing so, we cannot conclude the evidence produced by the State to show appellant intentionally caused the death of Gregor and attempted murder of Jennings is so uncertain, inconsistent, improbable, or unbelievable that it would be clearly unjust to allow the verdicts to stand. See Scott v. State, 934 S.W.2d 396, 398 (Tex. App.--Dallas 1996, no pet.). Nor can we conclude the verdicts are so contrary to the overwhelming weight of the evidence as to be clearly wrong or unjust. See Clewis, 922 S.W.2d at 129; Scott, 934 S.W.2d at 398. Accordingly, we conclude the evidence is factually sufficient.
We overrule appellant's point of error and affirm the trial court's judgments.
LINDA THOMAS
CHIEF JUSTICE
Do Not Publish
Tex. R. App. P. 47
Page 1 2 3 4 Texas DUI Attorneys
DUI Lawyers
|
| |
to fill out a simple form to connect to DUI Lawyers in your area.
|
|