 |
 |
to fill out a simple form to connect to DUI Lawyers in your area.
|
|
|
|
|
People v. Barker12/9/2004
Appeal by defendant from a judgment of the Justice Court, Town of Wawayanda, Orange County (P. Gromacki, J.), rendered on November 6, 2003, convicting him of driving while intoxicated (Vehicle and Traffic Law § 1192 ) and imposing sentence.
Judgment of conviction unanimously reversed upon the law, fine, if paid remitted, and matter remanded to the court below for a new trial.
The results of the blood test, indicating that defendant's blood alcohol level was .24 percent, was improperly admitted at trial. The regulations of the New York State Health Department require that the blood be drawn into, or subsequently deposited into, a container which contains a solid anticoagulant (New York State Department of Health Regulations [10 NYCRR] § 59.2). The court's return fails to establish that the People introduced evidence indicating compliance with said regulations. Due to the lack of competent evidence from which the trier of fact could conclude that the chemicals contained in the tubes into which defendant's blood was drawn were of the proper kind and amount and did not disturb the integrity of the blood sample, a new trial is warranted (see People v McDonagh, NYLJ, Apr. 3, 1992 [App Term, 9th & 10th Jud Dists]).
In view of the forgoing, we need not consider the remaining issues raised on appeal.
Page 1 New York DUI Attorneys
DUI Lawyers
|
| |
to fill out a simple form to connect to DUI Lawyers in your area.
|
|