DUI Lawyers Directory. Search for a dui lawyer near you. Operating a vehicle while drinking could cause judicial actions.
 Zip Code Search for DUI Lawyers
Defending Alleged Drunk Driving Criminal Acts Read about successful dui defense cases from member dui lawyers Read about successful dui defense cases from member dui lawyers Membership at DUI Defenders Discuss issues related to dui/dwi/owi Contact Us about a DUI Lawyer
facebook.com/MyDUI

  to fill out a simple form to connect to DUI Lawyers in your area.

State v. Campbell

9/10/2002

SUMMARY DISPOSITION ORDER


Plaintiff-appellant State of Hawaii [hereinafter, the prosecution] appeals from an order by the Circuit Court of the First Circuit, the Honorable Reynaldo Graulty, presiding, suppressing evidence of defendant-appellee Jason J. Campbell's breath alcohol test result. On appeal, the prosecution argues that the circuit court erred in suppressing evidence of Campbell's breath alcohol concentration test because he was fully apprised of the applicable sanctions under the administrative license revocation scheme. The defense responds, inter alia, that the warnings contained in Form 396B were inadequate because they failed to inform Campbell: (1) that he could be charged with habitually driving under the influence of intoxicating liquor; and (2) of the definition of "prior alcohol enforcement contacts."


Upon carefully reviewing the record and the briefs submitted by the parties and having given due consideration to the issues raised and the arguments presented, we hold that neither Hawaii Revised Statutes §§ 286-151 nor 286-255 (Supp. 2000) require that drivers be warned that they may be charged with habitually driving under the influence of intoxicating liquor or drugs pursuant to HRS § 291-4.4 (Supp. 2000). However, inasmuch as: (1) the circuit court's findings of fact indicate that its ruling was also based upon the defense's argument that Campbell was not informed of the definition of "prior alcohol enforcement contacts"; and (2) the prosecution failed to address this argument, raised by the defense below and again in its answering brief, we hold that the prosecution has waived any challenge to this basis for the circuit court's ruling, see Hawaii Rules of Appellate Procedure Rule 28(b)(7) (2000), and, therefore, has failed to sustain its burden of demonstrating error in the record. See State v. Hoang, 93 Hawaii 333, 336, 3 P.3d 499, 502 (2000). Accordingly,


IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the November 13, 2001 "Findings of Fact, Conclusions of Law, and Order Granting Defendant Jason J. Campbell's Motion to Preclude Evidence of Result of Alcohol Concentration Test" is affirmed.






Page 1 

Hawaii DUI Attorneys    DUI Lawyers


  to fill out a simple form to connect to DUI Lawyers in your area.

DUI Driving Defined Highway Defined
Under Influence Defined DUI/3 Strikes DUI & Manslaughter
DUI & Murder DUI Punishment Sobriety Checkpoints
DMV's Role in DUI Revocation vs. Suspension Field Sobriety Testing
Speed Measurement Prior DUI Convictions Drawing Blood & Consent
Refusal to Test DUI Lawyers Testimonials by Member DUI Lawyers
DUI Articles Ignition Interlock Implied Consent
Summary DUI License Suspension In-home Arrest Vehicle Defined
FDP  |   RSS Feeds  |  Articles  |  Jobs  |  Leads  |  Partner Websites  |  Draeger FAQ
SiteMap | DUI Blog | DUI Lawyers | DUI Attorneys | Trading Partners | Member Agreement | Terms of Service
Attorneys Click Here | DUI Case Laws | FAQ | DUI Forum | Directory of DUI Attorneys | Success Stories  | Press Releases
Copyright © 2004. “DUI Defenders”. All rights reserved.