 |
 |
to fill out a simple form to connect to DUI Lawyers in your area.
|
|
|
|
|
Teaster v. State10/27/2000
uld believe that they had worn off sufficiently at that time to decide that he wasn't guilty." Counsel further claimed "that was the only reasonable argument to make from the evidence." "The allegation that counsel gave an ineffective closing argument is a matter of trial strategy which does not provide a basis for post-conviction relief." State v. Hamilton, 791 S.W.2d 789, 797 (Mo.App. 1990). We cannot disturb the motion court's decision that trial counsel's comment, when viewed in context, was reasonable trial strategy. Therefore, Movant's second subpoint is without merit.
We are not left with the definite and firm impression a mistake has been made and do not find the motion court's findings and conclusions are clearly erroneous. Point denied.
The judgment is affirmed.
Page 1 2 3 Missouri DUI Attorneys
DUI Lawyers
|
| |
to fill out a simple form to connect to DUI Lawyers in your area.
|
|