 |
 |
to fill out a simple form to connect to DUI Lawyers in your area.
|
|
|
|
|
State v. Gleeson12/7/2000
e to questions.
[ ] Gleeson's final argument rests on his claim he lacked rapport with his attorney. During two pre-trial proceedings, Gleeson made certain statements regarding his attorney's ineffectiveness while at other times he made certain statements praising his attorney. Prior to trial, he filed ethical complaints against the trial court, prosecutor, and his defense attorney. Gleeson, however, at the time of trial agreed to have his attorney represent him, and a review of the record does not manifest he had an inability to assist his attorney in his defense. Mere evidence of complaints and dissatisfaction, without more, does not establish sufficient doubt as to defendant's competency.
III.
[ ] We conclude based on our review of the record there were no facts or circumstances present before the trial court which should have created a sufficient doubt of the defendant's competency so as to warrant a hearing on the issue. Accordingly, the judgment is affirmed.
[ ]Mary Muehlen Maring
William A. Neumann
Dale V. Sandstrom
Carol Ronning Kapsner
Gerald W. VandeWalle, C.J.
Page 1 2 3 4 North Dakota DUI Attorneys
DUI Lawyers
|
| |
to fill out a simple form to connect to DUI Lawyers in your area.
|
|