DUI Lawyers Directory. Search for a dui lawyer near you. Operating a vehicle while drinking could cause judicial actions.
 Zip Code Search for DUI Lawyers
Defending Alleged Drunk Driving Criminal Acts Read about successful dui defense cases from member dui lawyers Read about successful dui defense cases from member dui lawyers Membership at DUI Defenders Discuss issues related to dui/dwi/owi Contact Us about a DUI Lawyer
facebook.com/MyDUI

  to fill out a simple form to connect to DUI Lawyers in your area.

Rollins v. State

9/13/2000

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND JUDGMENT


Appeal from the Superior Court, Third Judicial District, Anchorage, William H. Fuld, Judge.


Ralph Rollins appeals his convictions for felony driving while intoxicated and driving while his license was suspended . Under Alaska law, a motorist arrested for driving while intoxicated must submit to a breath test , but the police must offer the motorist an opportunity for an independent blood test. Rollins contends that he was denied the opportunity for an independent blood test and so, as a consequence, the superior court should have suppressed the results of his breath test.


The tape of the DWI processing reveals that the officer advised Rollins of his right to an independent test. On the tape, Rollins makes no audible response to the officer's statement, and then the officer can be heard saying "no". The superior court heard conflicting testimony on the meaning of this "no".


The officer testified that, when he advised Rollins of his right to an independent test, Rollins shook his head "no". Observing Rollins's non-verbal response, the officer stated "no" in confirmation. Rollins, on the other hand, testified that after the officer read the notice concerning Rollins's right to an independent test, the officer interjected "no" without giving Rollins a chance to respond. In other words, Rollins claimed that the officer answered the question for Rollins - in effect, telling Rollins that he would not be receiving an independent test.


The trial judge, having listened to the tape and having heard this conflicting testimony, concluded that the officer's version of events was more accurate. He found that Rollins was advised of his right to an independent test and that Rollins consciously declined the test, manifesting his choice by shaking his head "no".


We have reviewed the record, and we conclude that the trial judge's finding of fact is not clearly erroneous. Accordingly, the judgment of the superior court is AFFIRMED.






Page 1 

Alaska DUI Attorneys    DUI Lawyers


  to fill out a simple form to connect to DUI Lawyers in your area.

DUI Driving Defined Highway Defined
Under Influence Defined DUI/3 Strikes DUI & Manslaughter
DUI & Murder DUI Punishment Sobriety Checkpoints
DMV's Role in DUI Revocation vs. Suspension Field Sobriety Testing
Speed Measurement Prior DUI Convictions Drawing Blood & Consent
Refusal to Test DUI Lawyers Testimonials by Member DUI Lawyers
DUI Articles Ignition Interlock Implied Consent
Summary DUI License Suspension In-home Arrest Vehicle Defined
FDP  |   RSS Feeds  |  Articles  |  Jobs  |  Leads  |  Partner Websites  |  Draeger FAQ
SiteMap | DUI Blog | DUI Lawyers | DUI Attorneys | Trading Partners | Member Agreement | Terms of Service
Attorneys Click Here | DUI Case Laws | FAQ | DUI Forum | Directory of DUI Attorneys | Success Stories  | Press Releases
Copyright © 2004. “DUI Defenders”. All rights reserved.